Tag: Erica-Chenoweth
Ash Center
for Democratic Governance and Innovation
Publisher: Harvard Kennedy School
Recommended by Bob B.
The Ash Center believes that diverse perspectives are paramount to better understanding and addressing real-world problems. As a global community that brings together students, faculty, staff, and fellows, with practitioners and policymakers from around the world, we focus on advancing excellence in democracy and self-government. We are committed to fostering an environment of rigor, curiosity, and integrity. As a Center, we therefore value and respect different opinions, lived experiences, and diverse research and policy areas and approaches. We continue to strive for excellence while creating an equitable and inclusive community for all.
Ash Center YouTube
The Breakdown with Erica Chenoweth and Steve Levitsky
Sign up for the next session with the link after this image.
The Breakdown with Erica Chenoweth and Steve Levitsky
Erica Chenoweth illuminates the value of nonviolent resistance in societal conflicts
by Ralph Ranalli
Publisher: Harvard Kennedy School
A short article by Ralph Ranalli published on the website of the Harvard Kennedy School in 2019, summarizing Erica Chenoweth’s work.
Read Article
The success of nonviolent civil resistance
Why Civil Resistance Works
The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict
by Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan
Publisher: Columbia University Press
For more than a century, from 1900 to 2006, campaigns of nonviolent resistance were more than twice as effective as their violent counterparts in achieving their stated goals. By attracting impressive support from citizens, whose activism takes the form of protests, boycotts, civil disobedience, and other forms of nonviolent noncooperation, these efforts help separate regimes from their main sources of power and produce remarkable results, even in Iran, Burma, the Philippines, and the Palestinian Territories.
Combining statistical analysis with case studies of specific countries and territories, Erica Chenoweth and Maria J. Stephan detail the factors enabling such campaigns to succeed and, sometimes, causing them to fail. They find that nonviolent resistance presents fewer obstacles to moral and physical involvement and commitment, and that higher levels of participation contribute to enhanced resilience, greater opportunities for tactical innovation and civic disruption (and therefore less incentive for a regime to maintain its status quo), and shifts in loyalty among opponents’ erstwhile supporters, including members of the military establishment.



